https://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/01/arts/television/unguarded-documentary-about-chris-herren-on-espn-review.html
I
chose to read reviews of Unguarded, the
documentary I watched prior to last class which tells the story of Chris Herren,
an ex-NBA player who struggled with drug addiction throughout his basketball
career. I read a review on NewYorkTimes.com that was written shortly after the doc’s
release in 2011. It begins by describing the storytelling methodology of the
documentary and introduces Herren’s story as well as information about the
director. Next, some examples of the more noteworthy, striking, and vivid
stories from the documentary are described, likely to build interest since the
review is overall quite positive. However, the reviewer does raise some
questions about the doc as well as pointing out areas that he thinks were
intentionally glossed over, "It’s
a highly polished production, and while it feels brutally frank, you can’t help
wondering what you’re not hearing.” This questioning portion of the review was
what I found most engaging as someone who has seen the doc recently. I already knew
all of the information that the reviewer goes over in the early parts of the article,
but this analysis helped me think deeper about what I had watched. As this was
a review published in a mass media publication like the New York Times as well
as online, it seems appropriate that the author gave a good amount of introduction
to the story since many people who come across the article likely haven’t seen
the doc before. The analysis as the end of the review helped engage me, as
someone who had already seen the doc, but I think this genre of review is targeted
towards and best suited for people who haven’t seen it yet and may be
considering it. The analysis is also vague enough that it doesn’t give anything
away, but also provides the reader with something to thing about when they are
watching.
Comments
Post a Comment